Linda L. Davis
Registered nurse, Wound care certified
5 on the ECS panel
Pressure injury cases turn on a technical question that general clinicians often answer poorly: was this wound avoidable? The federal standard at F686 does not ask whether a wound developed. It asks whether the facility evaluated the resident, implemented interventions consistent with need, monitored them and revised them when they failed.
A wound-certified expert also settles classification disputes that decide both liability and damages. Deep tissue injury, unstageable eschar, moisture-associated skin damage, arterial and venous ulcers and skin failure at end of life are different findings, and mislabeling happens on both sides.
Read: Pressure injury litigation: avoidable or unavoidable, records and expert selection
Ask for these with the CV. ECS sends the CV and fee schedule within 24 hours and testimony history on request.
Availability and conflicts are confirmed on the call.
Registered nurse, Wound care certified
Registered nurse, Wound care certified
Registered nurse, Wound care certified
Registered nurse, Wound care certified
Physician, Wound care certified
Avoidable versus unavoidable, turning and repositioning, staging, and nutrition.
See this case type ›Weight loss, intake documentation, feeding assistance, and dietitian involvement.
See this case type ›Change in condition, notification timing, delayed transfer, and infection control.
See this case type ›Operational standard of care: staffing, policy, supervision, reporting and corporate direction.
See the discipline ›Nursing standard of care: assessment, care planning, documentation, notification and supervision.
See the discipline ›Causation, clinical judgment, medication, sepsis timelines and medical director duties.
See the discipline ›CVs and fee schedules inside 24 hours.